| 1 |
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 16:45 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 18 May 2008 11:42:08 -0400 |
| 3 |
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > If it's not a GLEP then what is it then? What are we following or not? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's already been answered in this thread far too many times. Please |
| 8 |
> read before posting. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I have read and re-read. It's only until recent postings/comments are we |
| 11 |
starting to say this is not a GLEP. It's not part of the Bylaws. So what |
| 12 |
is it? How official is it? Who enforces it? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Re-reading, just brings me across more reference to it being a GLEP. |
| 15 |
Which again, in later threads, it's being mentioned it's not a GLEP. |
| 16 |
What else do we have document and policy wise? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Also if it's a constitution, or such for the council. Why is like ~70% |
| 19 |
of the document, talking about the past. Personal point of view from |
| 20 |
those writing the document. Things other than what section B is, and |
| 21 |
declares. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
If more time was spent on clarifying section B, and less on talking |
| 24 |
about the past, problems, personal input/opinion. Things that would make |
| 25 |
this a much more official document, what ever it is. Then this mess |
| 26 |
would not exist, and we would have set policies and procedures to |
| 27 |
follow. Instead we have a partial punishment, that doesn't mention at |
| 28 |
all how to go about enforcing it. As in council is stripped of power. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Does the current council, still hold/wield any power from now until they |
| 31 |
are replaced? What is the extent/limitations of that power in the |
| 32 |
intern? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 36 |
amd64/Java/Trustees |
| 37 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives