1 |
On 20/03/12 06:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time |
3 |
> to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda |
4 |
> to discuss or vote on. |
5 |
|
6 |
Newer udev (180+) is attempting to force /usr to be mounted *very* early |
7 |
in the boot sequence. No other software has this requirement, and it is |
8 |
going to break LVM2 users that have a separate /usr. Our official |
9 |
documentation recommends this, even today: |
10 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml |
11 |
|
12 |
Now that it is unmasked and unleashed on ~arch users, this might result |
13 |
in an attempt to stable it. I would like for the council to decide on |
14 |
whether a separate /usr is still a supported configuration. |
15 |
If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and alternatives should be |
16 |
investigated. If it isn't, a lot of documentation will have to be |
17 |
updated. (And an alternative should likely still be provided) |
18 |
|
19 |
Regards, |
20 |
Tony V. |