1 |
W dniu pon, 04.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶55 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > W dniu pon, 04.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶19 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman |
5 |
> > napisał: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > > If marking the profile as dev causes some breakage for users, then |
8 |
> > > those users should seriously consider contributing to the arch team, |
9 |
> > > because they're probably the only people around who might potentially |
10 |
> > > do so. If not, they get to keep the pieces. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > ...or dumping Gentoo for a distribution that doesn't dump huge breakage |
13 |
> > on users in week's time. Guess which one is more likely to happen. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> |
16 |
> We can of course send out a news item in advance and warn of possible |
17 |
> issues if they stick with stable keywords. That is no effectively |
18 |
> different than just removing the stable keywords - either breaks if |
19 |
> the user takes no action. |
20 |
|
21 |
No. Dumping stable in favor of ~arch is one thing, that can be easily |
22 |
fixed on user's side by using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~hppa". Or a profile |
23 |
change for users who do not override ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. |
24 |
|
25 |
Dumping profile stability altogether means that even ~arch won't work |
26 |
correctly anymore. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Michał Górny |