1 |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:30:25PM -0800, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:07 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:15 PM Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@g.o> |
5 |
> > wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to |
8 |
> >> > repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously |
9 |
> >> > suggested one (since the last meeting). |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> I would like to propose the council consider shutting down the "Off the |
12 |
> >> Wall" |
13 |
> >> (OTW) forum on forums.gentoo.org permanently and without replacement. |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > FWIW my reply is very long but mostly comes down to what I feel is..lets |
17 |
> > try to call it 3 principles. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > (1) I strongly prefer folks to make a good faith effort to work with |
20 |
> > others. |
21 |
> > (2) I want to make decisions based on shared goals and policies, not |
22 |
> > people's personal preferences. |
23 |
> > (3) I want to make decisions based on data. To that end I've tried to |
24 |
> > provide some data to clarify some various points. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Branching this thread, because I'm interested more in the process parts. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> More principles here and in general decision making. If we ditch a thing |
30 |
> because "you like it" or "you think it's toxic" it's a subjective basis for |
31 |
> decision making. It poses a few challenges. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> - It's functionally easy to reverse, because subjective decisions are |
34 |
> basically capricious. We can elect a new council and they can just undo it |
35 |
> because there is no rational basis for the decision. |
36 |
|
37 |
So is the nature of democracy. |
38 |
|
39 |
> - Do they agree that comments in OTW violate the CoC? I think the answer |
40 |
> is currently unclear (but maybe it is clear, I dunno.) |
41 |
|
42 |
> - Do they agree that the CoC is clear (and so are comfortable enforcing |
43 |
> it?) They seem to enforce some kind of moderation in other forums, so that |
44 |
> is a good sign at least. It also means if the CoC is unclear, we can |
45 |
> discuss and amend it..but I don't think that discussion ever really took |
46 |
> place. |
47 |
|
48 |
Simply because this has become the "norm" does not justify it. You |
49 |
are making an assumption that "enforcement here" and "not there" is |
50 |
because of some conscious decision to do the "right thing" by the CoC. |
51 |
It is not. It has clearly been stated and proven that mods mostly ignore |
52 |
OTW and let it go. Over time, that has become a problem... so "fixing |
53 |
it" is difficult. |
54 |
|
55 |
> - Do they agree that if the Coc was amended or clarified, they would |
56 |
> enforce it in OTW? |
57 |
|
58 |
See below. This is silly. |
59 |
|
60 |
> - Do you agree that OTW could stay if the CoC was enforced satisfactorily? |
61 |
> |
62 |
|
63 |
Yes, but it is a lost cause. Also, finding someone to "clean it up" will |
64 |
likely be more difficult than finding a tax specialist who only uses |
65 |
open source software. Because, principles. |
66 |
|
67 |
> If we disagree that OTW can stay if the CoC was enforced...then any further |
68 |
> conversation seems pointless. |
69 |
> |
70 |
|
71 |
See previous comments regarding the steady decline of OTW and the |
72 |
inability to properly moderate it now. |
73 |
|
74 |
> If forum-mods refuse to enforce the CoC in OTW, then we are forced to |
75 |
> either find new mods for OTW, or close it. |
76 |
> |
77 |
|
78 |
Remove privileges, delete the forum subsection (or whatever it is), and |
79 |
burn the content. It contains very offensive (oh, subjectiveness) |
80 |
content. I wouldn't want an individual with privileges who finds such |
81 |
content acceptable. |
82 |
|
83 |
> If the forum-mods disagree that OTW posts violate the CoC, then we need to |
84 |
> either convince them or modify the CoC. |
85 |
> |
86 |
|
87 |
As I stated in my reply to the other thread... you cannot legislate |
88 |
common sense. The inability of someone to rationally interpret the CoC |
89 |
and understand the relevance of the forums to the distro is *not* a |
90 |
reason to modify our CoC. |
91 |
|
92 |
Sure, we can "convince them" but at this stage... they likely don't |
93 |
share a common view of the distro with the rest of the community. |
94 |
|
95 |
> Many of these problems have clear next steps...but I have no idea where we |
96 |
> landed in this process at all or why it is suddenly deemed futile to stop |
97 |
> trying and go directly to "close forum." |
98 |
> |
99 |
|
100 |
As said in other thread, there has been clear escalation. There are bugs |
101 |
to show it. I was fairly certain you were "aware of it." |
102 |
|
103 |
-- |
104 |
Cheers, |
105 |
Aaron |