| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/01/2015 09:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> Dnia 2015-10-01, o godz. 21:14:06 Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 6 |
> <k_f@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> On 10/01/2015 09:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>>> d) Simple and stupid mapping for e-mail aliases: project |
| 14 |
>>>>> shortname y -> e-mail alias is y-project@g.o Legacy (e.g. |
| 15 |
>>>>> y@g.o) addresses will be forwarded. |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>> I would actually prefer a separate namespace for that in the |
| 18 |
>>>> form of project@×××××××××××.org (the name of the subdomain |
| 19 |
>>>> doesn't necessarily matter and can be shortened further etc |
| 20 |
>>>> if that makes it more appealing) |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> Doesn't this bring back the issues with reserved usernames? |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> Could you expand on that, please? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Weren't we initially using those '-bugs' etc. suffixes because |
| 28 |
> project names collided with system usernames? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
but would that really be an issue in a segregated subdomain? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
- -- |
| 34 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 35 |
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 36 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWDY8bAAoJECULev7WN52Fi2oH/1jgaUR2sjJ1qpxggV7tvVP+ |
| 40 |
LEWRmsX3ZG3lYoiY07/6cgAU/2XYrjtciQV/5OVYs2CRTNP8r+31vPgALXC5op6Y |
| 41 |
yp/PIP37AWx1GV8ar9A3JqL2zYsgbUa9/K2ne9/CWSXSAWPcXi2Gh92KflZsrpXF |
| 42 |
GQMzsQ9q3d7qVfsWx0XUiyQtPGUmpia4OVaCjW1tkt1yT2p7dZhG7raYmAFVZ+zA |
| 43 |
iEWhfhTMgWUiPWc28TcTdNLuCkTcxoebubqlbicqGoZh2WSYxZt4DhjUv2ntCjNt |
| 44 |
DBM/iE1dQ0sYzTzeuulnNL0sHu9ffZrduWsiRBCmuf0G2xRa7rA7ml2QxDWcp/U= |
| 45 |
=ZDVR |
| 46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives