1 |
On 2011.08.16 19:28, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:12:32PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
5 |
> > Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a |
6 |
> developer |
7 |
> > has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not happy with a |
8 |
> > Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same people in |
9 |
> the |
10 |
> > Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same people will |
11 |
> vote |
12 |
> > twice on that matter. A developer who wants to appeal to Council, |
13 |
> seeks |
14 |
> > a review of his case and a fresh voting from new people. However, |
15 |
> having |
16 |
> > devrel members, which are already biased based on the previous |
17 |
> decision, |
18 |
> > makes the "Council's court role" a moot role :) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> It definitely does create a conflict of interest. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I think there are a couple of ways to handle it: |
23 |
> |
24 |
> 1) don't allow council members to be in devrel, or |
25 |
> 2) don't allow council members who are also in devrel to vote in |
26 |
> appeals. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> What does everyone think? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> William |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
Team, |
35 |
|
36 |
I think anyone who gets elected to council has the trust of developers |
37 |
to recluse themselves avoid the conflict of interest. It becomes a |
38 |
problem when council is almost a subset of devrel and there are very |
39 |
few people, perhaps zero, who were not involved in the original devrel |
40 |
decision. |
41 |
|
42 |
Council were set up to provide technical leadership, so maybe appeals, |
43 |
need to be heard by a different body anyway. Maybe by a randomly |
44 |
selected group of devs assembled on a case by case basis, as has |
45 |
already been suggested? |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
Regards, |
49 |
|
50 |
Roy Bamford |
51 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
52 |
elections |
53 |
gentoo-ops |
54 |
forum-mods |
55 |
trustees |