| 1 |
On 13/10/16 16:41, NP-Hardass wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/13/2016 11:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:18 AM, NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> And I said nothing about limiting or expanding Foundation influence. I |
| 5 |
>>> merely said that the Foundation takes the official stance of endorsing |
| 6 |
>>> Council as an insititution as defined by GLEP 39 to handle certain |
| 7 |
>>> aspects of Gentoo at this time. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> I think that we're conflating legal standing with the reality that |
| 10 |
>> we're a community-based distro. |
| 11 |
> Yeah, I'm not attempting to go that deep. I'm just saying that if the |
| 12 |
> Foundation feels it to be helpful, they can official endorse the Council |
| 13 |
> and GLEP:39 to govern day to day operations of Gentoo. By endorse, I |
| 14 |
> mean say "We recognize the developer community's decision to self govern |
| 15 |
> day to day operations and will support them at this time in that |
| 16 |
> decision using the currently defined structure based on GLEP:39 as |
| 17 |
> necessary." Endorsement done, nothing fancy, just stating approval of |
| 18 |
> the current situation. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
+1 |
Archives