Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:02:01
Message-Id: 8cbf79a72d29324fc51ac932faa4d2024e5d4609.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions by Alexis Ballier
1 On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 18:18 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
2 > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:55:57 +0200
3 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 > > On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 16:29 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
6 > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:25:57 +0200
7 > > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
8 > > >
9 > > > > Why do you
10 > > > > presume that ComRel will never abuse its power, and at the same
11 > > > > time presume QA will kick people 'on a whim'?
12 > > >
13 > > > comrel does not create any rule. QA does. That's called separation
14 > > > of powers.
15 > >
16 > > If you follow that logic, we end up with ComRel deciding to punish
17 > > people based on the private opinions of its members rather than
18 > > established rules.
19 > >
20 >
21 > what logic?
22
23 The logic that ComRel apparently doesn't create rules. Ergo, ComRel
24 punishes without rules.
25
26 --
27 Best regards,
28 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>