Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:41:39
Message-Id: 9D6C1FE7-0972-47C3-B93C-033D7BDC865E@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals by Kristian Fiskerstrand
On February 13, 2018 8:51:59 AM EST, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote:
>On 02/13/2018 02:43 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: >> You make a lot of bold claims. If only they were true. There is >definitely one council member who has said they WILL NOT recuse >themselves from a council vote if a conflict arose. They even went on >to quote the lack of policy forcing them to recuse themselves. > >As this is likely referring to me, it is a misattribution that is >actually more in line with rich0's statements than anything else. A >difference of opinion does not necessarily constitute a conflict of >interest, and I will not recuse myself on general grounds from a >council >decision because I'm also involved (lead or not) of a project. > >I explicitly said I _would_ recuse myself if there is a conflict of >interest.
Right, you did state that. The issue is the misunderstanding of a conflict of interest as noted in my previous reply to Rich. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>