| 1 |
On February 13, 2018 8:51:59 AM EST, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>On 02/13/2018 02:43 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> You make a lot of bold claims. If only they were true. There is |
| 4 |
>definitely one council member who has said they WILL NOT recuse |
| 5 |
>themselves from a council vote if a conflict arose. They even went on |
| 6 |
>to quote the lack of policy forcing them to recuse themselves. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>As this is likely referring to me, it is a misattribution that is |
| 9 |
>actually more in line with rich0's statements than anything else. A |
| 10 |
>difference of opinion does not necessarily constitute a conflict of |
| 11 |
>interest, and I will not recuse myself on general grounds from a |
| 12 |
>council |
| 13 |
>decision because I'm also involved (lead or not) of a project. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>I explicitly said I _would_ recuse myself if there is a conflict of |
| 16 |
>interest. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Right, you did state that. The issue is the misunderstanding of a conflict of interest as noted in my previous reply to Rich. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Archives