| 1 |
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 00:42 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time |
| 3 |
> to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda |
| 4 |
> to discuss or vote on. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to |
| 7 |
> repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously |
| 8 |
> suggested one (since the last meeting). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I would like to request the Council to vote on making 17.1 profiles |
| 12 |
stable. The profiles were present for a 1.5 yr now, and are in dev for |
| 13 |
half a year. The most important obstacles on the course to migration |
| 14 |
have been removed, the remaining bugs being either 'cleanup to be done |
| 15 |
once we switch' or dead packages. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If large number of stable profiles is the problem, I'd suggest marking |
| 18 |
17.0 dev simultaneously. This shouldn't cause any major problems since |
| 19 |
breakage relating to one category of profiles and not the other is |
| 20 |
rather unlikely, and responsible devs use 'repoman full -d' anyway. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
Archives