1 |
On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 19:13 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 11:48:06 -0400 Aaron Bauman wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 06:28:15PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 16:11:50 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
5 |
> > > > > I support the idea of Gentoo being more inclusive. |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > Can we please keep irrelevant buzzwords out? |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > There is nothing irrelevant here. Gentoo is kicking people who |
10 |
> > > want to contribute because doesn't want to respect their privacy |
11 |
> > > because of some imaginary problems which were never appeared or |
12 |
> > > tested in real life. This makes Gentoo exclusive to those who want |
13 |
> > > their authorship to be public. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > Best regards, |
16 |
> > > Andrew Savchenko |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Andrew, it is not imaginary. Playing the emotional game doesn't help |
19 |
> > either. I am fairly certain all of those who had to make this decision |
20 |
> > have expressed their willingness to change it should it be supported |
21 |
> > legally. It simply is not. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> If it is not imaginary please provide a court case against Gentoo |
24 |
> or other free software distribution on this matter and some |
25 |
> evidence that proposed signed-off real name attribution played a |
26 |
> measurable effect. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> As far as I can see this whole story is pure speculation of: |
29 |
> 1) what may happen |
30 |
> 2) what will help if 1) is to happen. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> So far I saw zero practical evidence on both points. |
33 |
|
34 |
So to summarize, you're claiming that you're allowed to do anything |
35 |
as long as the other person can't prove somebody has already been |
36 |
punished for the same thing? I suppose that's a pretty interesting |
37 |
concept of law. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Best regards, |
41 |
Michał Górny |