| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 13/11/12 10:44 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 13-11-2012 09:06:19 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Fabian Groffen |
| 7 |
>> <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> On 12-11-2012 21:40:53 -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic |
| 10 |
>>>> related to udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay |
| 11 |
>>>> the vote for another month so that we have time to get |
| 12 |
>>>> organized? |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> The Council has no votes scheduled for today's meeting. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Huh? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Do you see the word "vote" in there? (It isn't in there on |
| 20 |
> purpose.) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Fabian |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
>> 2. Handling separate /usr support[1] (15 minutes) - |
| 26 |
>> approve/disapprove plan (forcing everyone to take action, and |
| 27 |
>> implement one of the two "supported" solutions) - |
| 28 |
>> approve/disapprove removal of gen_usr_ldscript - define |
| 29 |
>> timeframe * 30 days * 6 months * 1 year |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
In Rich and Ryao's defense, I would think it would be difficult to |
| 34 |
approve or disapprove of anything without voting on it. :) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlCia0sACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBDTQD/c7q/B1R+/nHTALnIi/X4WYuY |
| 41 |
+VZB7PKDkflXD9ws23QA/1LT8C/0+1NTgO8wVOBfl8kVdlB+25kTeN4hcYWdJzNp |
| 42 |
=3LrH |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives