| 1 |
On 2020-12-12 15:42, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 |
> Now we have a council member appealing directly to council again ... |
| 3 |
> that sends the message to the community, yet again, that the |
| 4 |
> processes that council are supposed to enforce don't apply to council |
| 5 |
> members. |
| 6 |
> Will the damage from that message ever be undone? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I really don't get your point here. What's your problem? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Council members are community members like everyone else. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
So in this case, Matt, who is also in council, brought up the code of |
| 13 |
conduct violations. Sure we can talk about the tone. But did anything |
| 14 |
happen? Did we break any rules? Did we treat his request preferentially |
| 15 |
in any way? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
From my POV his request was handled the same and is currently going |
| 18 |
through the same process like any other request: It was brought to |
| 19 |
mailing list, is getting discussed and a motion was formulated. If you |
| 20 |
don't agree on this motion feel free to either convince the community |
| 21 |
why this motion should get rejected or maybe formulate your own motion |
| 22 |
you want to pass. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Regards, |
| 27 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 28 |
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |
Archives