| 1 |
To make my point more clear: |
| 2 |
The concept of only voting like an untouchable high council which you |
| 3 |
need to address very formally doesn't work out (I am exaggerating). |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
We need more moderation and preventive mediation. Even ComRel does not |
| 6 |
get this done yet. They also seem to have a self-concept of staying in |
| 7 |
the background until stuff explodes or until someone calls very loud for |
| 8 |
them. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Maybe I need a reality check, but I don't see that this has worked out well. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
One of the bigger disagreements I see in the past is that the council |
| 13 |
didn't intervene when we had the multilib war. It was _technically_ all |
| 14 |
fine what had been done, but it was still a bad situation. But no one |
| 15 |
addressed the council directly (some people didn't want to go for a |
| 16 |
formal vote), so not much happened on that level. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I don't think it's enough to only get involved if someone goes for a |
| 19 |
formal council agenda item. Maybe that's exactly what the GLEP says, but |
| 20 |
it's not enough to improve the anarchy here. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
So... I'm glad about any person that tries to improve that part of the |
| 23 |
council and wants to extend the self-concept of the council, even if |
| 24 |
it's not within the official scope. |
Archives