| 1 |
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 8:48 AM Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Am Montag, 3. Mai 2021, 17:31:03 CEST schrieb Thomas Deutschmann: |
| 4 |
> > On 2021-05-03 17:04, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Please don't go the "we are not responsible for anything" route, |
| 6 |
> > > that's the fastest way to obstruct any productivity. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Well, I don't know what we will discuss and what will be the |
| 9 |
> > outcome. But imagine we would all agree and send a request to |
| 10 |
> > foundation to stop spending AWS credits for X immediately. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Foundation has to reject this request by law because such a request |
| 13 |
> > must come from a natural person. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Seriously, if the council would send a polite and friendly request to |
| 16 |
> the foundation, and the trustees would outright refuse it only for |
| 17 |
> that formal reason, I would consider that hostile and unconstructive |
| 18 |
> behavior. Law doesn't come in because the trustees themselves can |
| 19 |
> introduce motions. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> We should try to work together. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+1, if I did not make this clear in our IRC conversation; I want to |
| 24 |
make it clear now. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-A |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> If some of us don't do that, we need to find a better solution for |
| 30 |
> Gentoo. That's why (following the ugly debates around Ian) I want a |
| 31 |
> single elected body to be responsible. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 35 |
> dilfridge@g.o |
| 36 |
> Gentoo Linux developer |
| 37 |
> (council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives