1 |
On Tue, 16 May 2017 13:14:47 -0700 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'm not aware of anybody who is unwelcome to contribute to Gentoo |
5 |
> merely because people don't like them. I certainly don't have |
6 |
> knowledge of every particular case, so perhaps there have been cases |
7 |
> where this is the case. |
8 |
|
9 |
Your not aware of me? Most can see there is a clear bias, not to |
10 |
mention double standard. I think most can tell I am not liked. Thus I |
11 |
am routinely sought out. Likely worse if I was a developer again and |
12 |
more could be done to punish.... |
13 |
|
14 |
I seriously doubt anyone thinks any Gentoo Developer actually likes me. |
15 |
|
16 |
> However, part of the problem is that you're allowed to make |
17 |
> allegations like this on the lists, and anybody who has direct |
18 |
> knowledge to the contrary in any particular situation is not allowed |
19 |
> to say so. So, when we allow these sorts of things to be discussed on |
20 |
> the lists anybody reading the archives will inevitably get the |
21 |
> impression that Gentoo boots people out for arbitrary reasons. |
22 |
|
23 |
That is a widely know fact. If people inside Gentoo think otherwise. |
24 |
They may need to take a look outside the bubble. A simple Google search |
25 |
would show facts otherwise. |
26 |
|
27 |
> Sometimes people do things that are seriously wrong, and choosing to |
28 |
> allow them to participate could cause problems. |
29 |
|
30 |
That statement applies to much of Comrel and SEVERAL Gentoo |
31 |
developers... They are seriously in the wrong on so many levels. They |
32 |
are causing these problems. Not outsiders.... |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |