1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 08/01/2011 08:32 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
5 |
> On 01-08-2011 20:16:34 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: |
6 |
>>> Would you mind summarising/drafting up the policy for who can and who |
7 |
>>> can't get a cloak? This is probably going to be the GLEP that Petteri |
8 |
>>> refers to. Does it make sense to vote for this topic without that GLEP |
9 |
>>> in place? |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>> Anyone can (should) get a cloak upon developer's request. Petteri |
12 |
>> suggested to have the council vote and transfer the responsibility to |
13 |
>> devrel, which in accordance will include this in a new GLEP defining the |
14 |
>> devrel policy just like then one for QA. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Ok, thanks. |
17 |
> Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote for transferring |
18 |
> the cloak responsibility to devrel? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
Yes I think this is pretty much the gist. |
22 |
|
23 |
- -- |
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
28 |
|
29 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJONxCZAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCgOAP/2cUmYewKaRMsIkSI2IkLqrR |
30 |
e1rYmYFire9Nl9FCOoin1z9VBdE6Sq/xruu+M7+itDbLn3P30/oXkALXoMf3iDt0 |
31 |
scGKa7Ky831YV9wPE2lbliUcvaTu4Om9yYaUR5P0g96woLfjn2pU4dOuyBrEEpiF |
32 |
5LF637n+SsXJ1WuAcUbtUi/HlR4fd+xIKKXDmX70YTook3NxyLrfXbpdSHhcumuw |
33 |
HrujL/cfkqLq75f2K/URPW2SGze42CrXT/rPDcEfZgnmjnYXNECC/Fegii32b+Q7 |
34 |
+OnutrENFb3R1PF7Wo/9PSc0yfVd97N0KtN7SjWSLFfoTnHRqebsy4nwRi4Sz5Q/ |
35 |
bElYVt4cKo2kAwbeBgMz+ewoip6T+PrlmNZvXLR72dYjZrYgPw4LPZJcBWTqCC90 |
36 |
EnpXjTzuZV4obsr/wWN+JQUjh6mdC9UQ89f1eQp9+5uQP1PbQn5/FUX2nbyJfCbV |
37 |
wcsMOzIuR2Me5YLu2hnTisnRUKoI306u/v53qfV0hnRh+Klc9nlquklwAnointh2 |
38 |
D0GFS4tVe3K3joI8Lh80MtwlAP32kRWrbElcKuWQtXDvYIvQ3dM8/HNzYNoQnhPv |
39 |
itAWSbBghumgGay1Wwj/AIBawVf6bt3oz/ti2tcluo5f3bdNhbsnp9ff5fqVQQdd |
40 |
yBVXdyGvt/xmOCTTy4cY |
41 |
=W/1o |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |