1 |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 4:34 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 02:23:02PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
4 |
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:15 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > > On 17/06/18 19:07, Alec Warner wrote: |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > I really don't think this is true. Its explicitly not true for me. I was a |
9 |
> > > trustee because there were open slots and someone had to 'keep the lights |
10 |
> > > on.' |
11 |
> > > Other people who ran for the board have expressed similar sentiments. I am |
12 |
> > > running again in the next election on a platform of dissolution (closing |
13 |
> > > the foundation) which is again contrary to your argument. There is no point |
14 |
> > > in continuing to run a non-profit that continues to nominally accrue risk |
15 |
> > > with little or no upside. Eventually it will become so toxic that you will |
16 |
> > > be unable to find anyone to run it (some may say this has already begun to |
17 |
> > > happen.) This is evident partially by the board's reduction in numbers. |
18 |
> > > Previously the board had 13 seats, then 7, then 5. I'm not superbly |
19 |
> > > confident we will be able to fill 5 seats in the next election. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Rich, this argument makes no sense. |
22 |
|
23 |
I didn't write that. I suspect that somewhere along the way somebody |
24 |
messed up their quoting. That said, I largely agree with the point |
25 |
being made (I believe by Alec). |
26 |
|
27 |
(And to be fair, you did as well in your reply by not trimming the |
28 |
rest of the email below your last comment...) :) |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Rich |