| 1 |
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 11:12:45 PM EDT M. J. Everitt wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I think you've found a cause, or causes for appeal to Council, then, right? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I have made the case no policy has been followed. Thus no action against me |
| 6 |
can stand, so nothing to appeal. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Again in a court, if policies and procedures are not followed, a person cannot |
| 9 |
be prosecuted, nor can that ruling withstand. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If others want to act based on the facts of policies not being followed that |
| 12 |
is up to them. But I will not be appealing incorrect action that goes against |
| 13 |
policy. They do not have such authority to do things as they have. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Who punishes comrel? ( we know there is no oversight) |
| 16 |
What are their penalties for not following policies and procedures? Any? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
At minimum any individual who fails to follow published Comrel policies and |
| 19 |
procedures should be removed from that project. NOT Gentoo, nor having any |
| 20 |
further action against them. If they cannot follow policies and procedures of |
| 21 |
any project, they should not be part of that project. It is quite simple. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives