| 1 |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On wto, 2017-05-16 at 11:01 -0700, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> This is one of those situations where talking about a problem becomes |
| 5 |
>> a problem... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> No. Productive talk about a problem is not a problem. Productive talk |
| 8 |
> can bring solutions. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Certainly. But, nobody is offering solutions here. They're just |
| 11 |
pointing at problems, and often those problems have to do with |
| 12 |
manpower, where simply pointing at them doesn't accomplish much. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What is a problem is that neither ComRel nor Council wants to resolve |
| 16 |
> this situation and they let it span for months all over the place. So |
| 17 |
> I'm going to even support William's statement that changes are |
| 18 |
> necessary. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
++ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
There seems to be some interest in bringing back the proctors, which I |
| 24 |
personally think is a good idea. I wouldn't mind giving the devs some |
| 25 |
kind of direct say in how we approach this stuff as it is fairly |
| 26 |
controversial. However, I think that right now the situation is just |
| 27 |
frustrating everybody. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I think part of the reason that nobody wants to fix these issues is |
| 30 |
because people also don't like dealing with the backlash. Whoever |
| 31 |
suggests that xyz should be booted or that list traffic be moderated |
| 32 |
is going to be reviled by many. So, everybody just ignores the issue. |
| 33 |
It isn't like Comrel is getting paid... |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Rich |
Archives