| 1 |
> - I believe the necessity for a pseudonym must be justified to the |
| 2 |
> Foundation. Therefore, I'm not suggesting that people should remain |
| 3 |
> anonymous for arbitrary reasons. I am also **not** suggesting that we |
| 4 |
> get rid of the DCO. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
So let's assume I'm a foundation officer, sign some non-disclosure papers, and |
| 7 |
get told in detail why someone absolutely has to use a pseudonym. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I can't tell my trustee colleagues the details. The final decision has to be |
| 10 |
made by a vote though, since that's how decisions are made there. On what base |
| 11 |
should my colleagues make their decision? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 15 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 16 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 17 |
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives