Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-07-21
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:12:06
Message-Id: 20190713041159.tts3q23dplq4xfpd@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-07-21 by desultory
1 On 19-07-12 23:28:09, desultory wrote:
2 > On 07/07/19 15:30, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
3 > > In two weeks from now, the newly elected Council will have its
4 > > constituent meeting. This is the time to raise and prepare items that
5 > > the Council should put on the agenda to discuss or vote on.
6 > >
7 > > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to
8 > > repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously
9 > > suggested one (since the last meeting).
10 > >
11 > > The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on Sunday 2019-07-14.
12 > >
13 > > Please reply to the gentoo-project list.
14 > >
15 > > Ulrich
16 > >
17 > Since that I was directed to ask the council for their opinion regarding
18 > proctors handling of CoC matters by a member of proctors.
19 >
20 > Does the council consider that proctors internally formulating new
21 > policies, issuing a warning for having violated such (still unpublished)
22 > policies, and refusing to reply as a team when asked (by multiple
23 > individuals) to clarify what the new policies in fact were is a suitable
24 > usage of the authority delegated to proctors by the council?
25 >
26
27 I wonder if it'd be better to think of proctors as local law enforcement
28 and comrel as the national level. similar roles, different scopes.
29
30 --
31 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature