| 1 |
On 11/05/14 17:14, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 10 May 2014 13:43:04 +0000 |
| 3 |
> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Exactly, they should rather be the guys who jump in discussions that |
| 6 |
>> affect tree consistency etc. and help with general inquiries. |
| 7 |
> If only the community would expect and know us to be those guys. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Tried to help with a general inquiry today where QA team was CC-ed ... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509962#c3 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> ... where I ... |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> 1) hold on to policy by quoting it, which QA is asked to do; |
| 16 |
> 2) give Samuli the benefit of doubt, as to let him talk first; |
| 17 |
> 3) contact multiple persons from the arch teams to be fully aware, |
| 18 |
> answers ranging from "Samuli can do that" [a personal exception?] |
| 19 |
> to "That's rude" [the opposite of that exception?]; so, confusing; |
| 20 |
> 4) explicitly choose not to bitch at all or escalate to ComRel; |
| 21 |
> 5) ... |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> ... but in response I get ... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
what do you expect, if every second day you end up protecting your |
| 26 |
work from the qa@ team's newer developers, including yourself, never |
| 27 |
admitting any wrong doings, never receiving an proper apology for the |
| 28 |
wasted time, slapping QA tag on it |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
in total, you can count the wasted time in days, if not soon in weeks, |
| 31 |
not minutes, so i feel |
| 32 |
the time for "extra" politeness has passed, already gave it a go, didn't |
| 33 |
get the expected |
| 34 |
results |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
- Samuli |
Archives