Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:07:08
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council by Ulrich Mueller
Hash: SHA256

On 01-08-2011 21:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Petteri R├Ąty wrote: > >> Your rational is a bit off or can be understood incorrectly in how >> the current rules go. Discussion should happen on the on topic >> mailing list (most of the time gentoo-dev or gentoo-project). >> gentoo-project is only used to submit threads to the agenda >> regardless of where the discussion happens. gentoo-dev-announce >> can be used to draw attention to important things. How do you >> propose people decide if something is gentoo-council material or do >> we go back to the situation where threads get fragmented to >> multiple mailing lists? If actual discussion happens elsewhere >> than gentoo-council then I don't think we need a separate mailing >> list just for handling agendas etc. Finally I think gentoo-project >> / gentoo-dev reach a wider audencience but we should get verified >> numbers from infra. > > gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we > split discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably > more, for example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on > gentoo-pms then.) > > That's too complicated for my simple mind.
Unfortunately you can't prevent it. You won't be able to force people to use gentoo-council to discuss any technical issues that have always been discussed on the gentoo-dev ml because it's simpler for the council members.
> Ulrich >
- -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJONzF6AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPDEsP/0+mSJw5dHW2XT6f0NHgOWc6 7BaH5k0SIVkLnXc7TOHRnj7Z5xZxmoYhRJv82skgI3E0BlvumDwmVCaqwRTpY3OD JBimarj/FVD0zN6s49UpUxcOIG4B2mRC6pVtvyBQMAobqWq+tv7cX9yO7NN/CJGQ 1xFVgyL4BbTkbU2GgZwgMgZMv4N/yCcws6XiTGWbEbNFi2vs03UAhCkKCeAC+IXR 0cn/nxzMb75qS/AZoM+VasS0zq6YMJudDFcDS0pYscnlTJIi56AyvMf1KduUJcyf +ubCcdlzjsJAj1yJzuhby5VDG5tNfLFajLbknY0J6ktPxEzluCiu5l4ZdlJAz6vH Q00gRkEKYj2dsXXvadZsWLyGzsstZ3EnVBz/1IgV2HWniDvTyOPEyy4NPQpLxTKh DjbDcxZT4WG2nRMnYgFSmDbVu3ImblxgOkOToAhZUWFfNXtyIZIBoMKeaVTTnCaU 0sLiqTitn6q7loyaVzU4oyolmKW1ytEdaCYDwA2sG1KPMIoPEuPZSOkupsqEDs68 eDFZ8nRx4u0+oA57jZlnklMrv0NiMO4DfBfWrfhC02gyjO7uIYf/teyb1bJhaTM1 r/JO3Me2Ow3dHofyvmRUBve/0Pzl8YSiBHzMN1ZUX9jl9GXG7PKSAqu31OwNlFWF See9M/j6pAIE9RbG1Jym =KtRh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>