Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:07:08
Message-Id: 4E37317A.80208@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council by Ulrich Mueller
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 01-08-2011 21:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
5 >>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Petteri Räty wrote:
6 >
7 >> Your rational is a bit off or can be understood incorrectly in how
8 >> the current rules go. Discussion should happen on the on topic
9 >> mailing list (most of the time gentoo-dev or gentoo-project).
10 >> gentoo-project is only used to submit threads to the agenda
11 >> regardless of where the discussion happens. gentoo-dev-announce
12 >> can be used to draw attention to important things. How do you
13 >> propose people decide if something is gentoo-council material or do
14 >> we go back to the situation where threads get fragmented to
15 >> multiple mailing lists? If actual discussion happens elsewhere
16 >> than gentoo-council then I don't think we need a separate mailing
17 >> list just for handling agendas etc. Finally I think gentoo-project
18 >> / gentoo-dev reach a wider audencience but we should get verified
19 >> numbers from infra.
20 >
21 > gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we
22 > split discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably
23 > more, for example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on
24 > gentoo-pms then.)
25 >
26 > That's too complicated for my simple mind.
27
28 Unfortunately you can't prevent it. You won't be able to force people to
29 use gentoo-council to discuss any technical issues that have always been
30 discussed on the gentoo-dev ml because it's simpler for the council members.
31
32 > Ulrich
33 >
34
35 - --
36 Regards,
37
38 Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
39 Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng
40 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
41 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
42 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
43
44 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJONzF6AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPDEsP/0+mSJw5dHW2XT6f0NHgOWc6
45 7BaH5k0SIVkLnXc7TOHRnj7Z5xZxmoYhRJv82skgI3E0BlvumDwmVCaqwRTpY3OD
46 JBimarj/FVD0zN6s49UpUxcOIG4B2mRC6pVtvyBQMAobqWq+tv7cX9yO7NN/CJGQ
47 1xFVgyL4BbTkbU2GgZwgMgZMv4N/yCcws6XiTGWbEbNFi2vs03UAhCkKCeAC+IXR
48 0cn/nxzMb75qS/AZoM+VasS0zq6YMJudDFcDS0pYscnlTJIi56AyvMf1KduUJcyf
49 +ubCcdlzjsJAj1yJzuhby5VDG5tNfLFajLbknY0J6ktPxEzluCiu5l4ZdlJAz6vH
50 Q00gRkEKYj2dsXXvadZsWLyGzsstZ3EnVBz/1IgV2HWniDvTyOPEyy4NPQpLxTKh
51 DjbDcxZT4WG2nRMnYgFSmDbVu3ImblxgOkOToAhZUWFfNXtyIZIBoMKeaVTTnCaU
52 0sLiqTitn6q7loyaVzU4oyolmKW1ytEdaCYDwA2sG1KPMIoPEuPZSOkupsqEDs68
53 eDFZ8nRx4u0+oA57jZlnklMrv0NiMO4DfBfWrfhC02gyjO7uIYf/teyb1bJhaTM1
54 r/JO3Me2Ow3dHofyvmRUBve/0Pzl8YSiBHzMN1ZUX9jl9GXG7PKSAqu31OwNlFWF
55 See9M/j6pAIE9RbG1Jym
56 =KtRh
57 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>