| 1 |
On 08/15/2015 10:47 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/15/2015 01:24 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Do you see any other things that need to be tackled in order to get |
| 4 |
>> there? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Getting rid of dynamic deps in portage. Until then it's too easy for |
| 7 |
> portage users to commit stuff that's broken to the stricter package |
| 8 |
> managers. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Sure, dynamic deps is evil. However, for dependencies that come from |
| 11 |
eclasses, it may be unavoidable to change dependencies of existing |
| 12 |
ebuilds in ways that make dynamic deps matter. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Note that if a package manager has an option like emerge --changed-deps |
| 15 |
and that option is used for all updates, then dynamic deps becomes a |
| 16 |
moot point. |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Thanks, |
| 19 |
Zac |
Archives