1 |
W dniu nie, 01.10.2017 o godzinie 22∶41 +0200, użytkownik Andreas K. |
2 |
Huettel napisał: |
3 |
> Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2017, 21:24:53 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
4 |
> > [...] |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > 3. Also, if time permits we may take a look at the git pre-GLEP [3]. |
7 |
> > I have been delaying this for GLEP editors to pick it up but given that |
8 |
> > there has been no action for 2 months... Of course, if the GLEP reform |
9 |
> > is accepted, I'll port it to the new syntax. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > [3]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:Git |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> As extensions, how about: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/NNNNNN OBSOLETE |
18 |
> (optional third parameter gives the resolution) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/NNNNNN un-cc arm@g.o |
21 |
> or generically |
22 |
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/NNNNNN (command) (parameter) |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
I'd rather not obfuscate the syntax more. Furthermore, when I wanted to |
26 |
add un-CC support I got opinions that this doesn't really belong in |
27 |
commit messages. |
28 |
|
29 |
As for resolutions, I don't think that we really have a very good case |
30 |
for using different resolutions when closing via a commit. I mean, most |
31 |
of the time you use that tag because you actually fixed a bug. The only |
32 |
alternate case I see is when you're removing the package completely but |
33 |
I've seen many different ideas on what's the really correct status |
34 |
there... |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Best regards, |
38 |
Michał Górny |