1 |
W dniu pon, 02.10.2017 o godzinie 22∶01 +0200, użytkownik Kristian |
2 |
Fiskerstrand napisał: |
3 |
> On 10/02/2017 09:58 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
> > Does the PMS actually define what the correct behavior is for this |
5 |
> > syntax? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> it evaluates to a true, i.e always valid/resolved. And although |
8 |
> explicitly naming an empty group in an ebuild is, probably?, not useful, |
9 |
> I don't see why we'd have a definition that errors out on explicit |
10 |
> definition but not on an implicit reduction, as the package manager |
11 |
> needs to be able to handle the situation anyways. I'm all for banning |
12 |
> the empty construct in QA scope though. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Have you read the commit message? The current spec makes no sense by |
16 |
itself, and no package manager has been following it for 6+ years. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
Michał Górny |