From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 | ||
Date: | Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:28:17 | ||
Message-Id: | 20142.30765.50483.870591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 by "Petteri Räty" |
1 | >>>>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Let's vote on if you are allowed to remove functions from eclasses (or |
4 | > break the API in general): |
5 | |
6 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f797a983b0d11677a1f781e48ab4e97d.xml |
7 | |
8 | > Last time this came up a decision wasn't reached: |
9 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100726-summary.txt |
10 | |
11 | > The decision should then be documented here: |
12 | > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html |
13 | |
14 | Why do we need a decision here? Isn't it simply a special case of the |
15 | "adding and updating eclasses" policy? |
16 | |
17 | Ulrich |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |