| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 3:01 PM Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Given what we have seen in the security election this year, what |
| 4 |
> determines *who* can start an election? Maybe some clarity in GLEP 39? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
IMO if there is really a dispute over something like this for a |
| 8 |
project election there are some serious issues. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
However, if we MUST have rules I'd suggest that it is the |
| 11 |
responsibility of the project lead to call for the next project lead |
| 12 |
election. If there is no lead or if the lead has failed to do so in |
| 13 |
the last 12 months then anybody should be able to do so. Obviously it |
| 14 |
is best to just nudge the lead or work via consensus. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
IMO, formal ballots/etc for project leads is also overkill. I get the |
| 17 |
value for Council/Trustees, but I'm not sure it really adds value for |
| 18 |
regular projects. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives