| 1 |
On 11/05/14 19:51, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
>> 14) "TomWij is improving qa, didn't you notice? ;)". |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Do people really expect QA to be communicative, be motivated and work? |
| 5 |
> Of course we do, but are you sure you're tackling this problem the |
| 6 |
> right way? I haven't looked into this, but from your quotations and |
| 7 |
> from random comments on IRC I get the sure feeling you are perhaps |
| 8 |
> pushing people too hard, or at the least rubbing them the wrong way. |
| 9 |
> There is no hierarchy that puts QA above developers - you work with |
| 10 |
> volunteers and they are all trying their best to get things fixed, even |
| 11 |
> when this isn't immediately obvious to you or when the best solution |
| 12 |
> doesn't immediately present itself. And when you decide to force issues |
| 13 |
> through policies, you find that you don't actually have the resources |
| 14 |
> to do that, unless you are prepared to drive out the volunteers you |
| 15 |
> expected to start "fixing" things. Are matters of "policy" the carrot |
| 16 |
> or the stick? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
exactly what i'm thinking too. thanks, well put! ;) |
Archives