| 1 |
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:37:24 +0200 |
| 2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 26-10-2011 18:35:51 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > > In less than two weeks, the council will meet again. This is the |
| 9 |
> > > time to raise and prepare items that the council should put on |
| 10 |
> > > the agenda to vote on. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > As an extension of ChangeLog topic, I'd like to suggest to require |
| 13 |
> > developers to commit packages with matching (same) ChangeLog entries |
| 14 |
> > and commit messages. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ok, what's your rationale behind that? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
1) easier migration to autogenerated ChangeLogs if we want that at |
| 19 |
some point, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
2) better availability of the information (right now, looking up |
| 22 |
changes sometimes involves checking both CVS log and ChangeLog message |
| 23 |
to see what actually happened), |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
3) one step towards preventing useless ChangeLog entries. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Michał Górny |
Archives