From: | Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] call for agenda items, council meeting 8/13 | ||
Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:43:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 877eyokwad.fsf@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] call for agenda items, council meeting 8/13 by Mike Pagano |
1 | Hi Mike, |
2 | |
3 | Mike Pagano <mpagano@g.o> writes: |
4 | |
5 | > At the moment, we have a capacity problem around kernel stabilization. |
6 | > Upstream kernels are released at an extremely high rate and the Gentoo |
7 | > Kernel Maintainers do their best to release them shortly thereafter. |
8 | > |
9 | > Sometimes, arch teams are not able to respond to stablereqs in a timely |
10 | > manner. This is not a complaint on their efforts, just a description of |
11 | > what happens often for arch teams that are stressed to capacity. |
12 | |
13 | Is it feasible to reduce the workload by only stablizing the longterm |
14 | supported kernels? |
15 | |
16 | Yours, |
17 | Benda |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] call for agenda items, council meeting 8/13 | Mike Pagano <mpagano@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] call for agenda items, council meeting 8/13 | Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> |