| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Markos Chandras schrieb: |
| 5 |
> In the meantime, to prevent further escalations, I will use my lead |
| 6 |
> powers to request immediate bans whenever I see one of you violate the |
| 7 |
> CoC[2] and ignore the previous warnings. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> My fellow developers, it's time you finally realize that you are part of |
| 10 |
> a community and you must learn to behave and respect each other even if |
| 11 |
> you have different technical views. We are all people sharing a common |
| 12 |
> interest: Gentoo. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So, gathering some of the responses I tried to draw a complete picture of |
| 15 |
what is going to happen (where references are not publicly archived, I |
| 16 |
supplied their Message-ID): |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Enforcement of CoC will be proactive, not reactive[0,1]. This in my |
| 19 |
understanding means that devrel will not wait for reports of CoC |
| 20 |
violations. Instead, they or their assistants will be policing mailing |
| 21 |
lists and bugzilla[2] for infractions, and make an example of the first |
| 22 |
developer who transgresses the CoC[3]. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Bannable offenses will not be limited to direct personal insults, but also |
| 25 |
include trolling, being judgmental[4], labeling proposals or software as |
| 26 |
"crap"[5], saying things that could be seen as offensive in certain |
| 27 |
cultures or to people with certain personality traits[6], as well as making |
| 28 |
non-constructive statements[7]. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
To me this is a very grim picture. If hope it is not accurate, but if it is |
| 31 |
I hereby speak out against this. I'd like to see any emergency action |
| 32 |
limited to response to personal attacks and insults, and any stricter rules |
| 33 |
set only in place after Council decision. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Best regards, |
| 37 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
[0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2673 |
| 40 |
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2678/focus=2681 |
| 41 |
[2] <20130620140439.3397ff68@g.o> |
| 42 |
[3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2673/focus=86324 |
| 43 |
[4] <20130620104912.71d9b1cd@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> |
| 44 |
[5] <CAN3AtvoObhp_w1Ca7ryuzyLhpDhf1W4DyWqfwuPg6vWSKP+fPg@××××××××××.com> |
| 45 |
[6] <20130620104736.1d2c26e4@g.o> |
| 46 |
[7] <CAGfcS_kT1gbgdH6Z++F-q791OgNcxO_pfys4A17yatUhCNXdzQ@××××××××××.com> |
| 47 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 48 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 49 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlHDdXQACgkQ+gvH2voEPRDStQCcCim/snROmMpP+Se2WLQllqES |
| 52 |
G38AnjPmiyObydvN6Y7cqVliL28+EJcI |
| 53 |
=MGdE |
| 54 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives