| 1 |
On 22:55 Tue 29 Oct , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> ... |
| 3 |
> 1) top level project "Gentoo Programming Resources" |
| 4 |
> - title in table is wrong, should be (according to project page) "Gentoo |
| 5 |
> Resources for Programming Languages", or just "Programming Languages" |
| 6 |
> - has subprojects ada, haskell, ruby |
| 7 |
> proposed action: move java, lisp, perl, php, python in there as additional |
| 8 |
> subprojects |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
that project probably is ancient history now (but only george can tell). The |
| 12 |
only benefit I could see in such a project would be only for porting new |
| 13 |
languages and/or giving manpower to a herd maintaining some rare flavors (compilers / |
| 14 |
interpreters) (but there is a lang-misc herd, dont' know if it's |
| 15 |
related to some project though). I can't find a reason atm for |
| 16 |
example the lisp project to move as subproject of this and bug 151118[1] |
| 17 |
does not convince me. Here[2] someone can find the original discussion |
| 18 |
on this. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
As for what you wrote about cleanliness and order, I understand what you |
| 21 |
mean, but a web/wiki page listing all projects related to programming |
| 22 |
languages would serve the same. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151118 |
| 25 |
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/43072/ |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) |
| 29 |
( Gentoo Lisp Project ) |
Archives