| 1 |
On 11/13/2016 04:08 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday, November 13, 2016 3:59:30 AM EST Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 11/13/2016 03:47 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> When council overrules Comrel decision, is the developers record wiped |
| 6 |
>>> clean all history erased? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> History is history, it should never be erased as it forms the background |
| 9 |
>> for any discussions. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Ever heard of expunging... |
| 12 |
> Some injustices of the past are removed entirely... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That would affect the weighting being used for any given element, it'd |
| 15 |
still form part of any history. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> If during an appeal it was revealed comrel did not follow procedures and/or |
| 19 |
> had various conflicts of interest. It would very much be just cause to erase |
| 20 |
> any prior record. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
See above |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I appreciate the comment as it shows the current thinking of those with the |
| 26 |
> power. Given you are both Comrel and Council. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Another reason while appealing to those voicing their opinions publicly on |
| 29 |
> preserving status quo, their power, their positions, etc is completely |
| 30 |
> futile. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Though does mean you would have to refrain from any appeal, given 2 council |
| 33 |
> members are on Comrel. With you being one. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Any appeal where I'd been personally involved in the former case, as per |
| 37 |
comrel guidelines. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 41 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 42 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives