| 1 |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/03/11 18:41, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> - gpg control packet Good evening, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> The draft agenda for next week's council meeting is as follows: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> * Roll call (5 minutes; anyone later will be given a slacker mark) |
| 8 |
>> * Vote on whether we want to edit generated ChangeLogs and if |
| 9 |
>> 'yes' discuss the abstract implementation so we can finally start |
| 10 |
>> working on that. * Review open bugs with council involvement * Open |
| 11 |
>> floor - listen to the community |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> The manifest signing thingie needs further discussion and previous |
| 14 |
>> accepted GLEPs have to be implemented first. So I don't think it |
| 15 |
>> makes sense to include that in the next meeting. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Sorry, it is on the 11th instead of 10th of October |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I proposed EAPI 1 for profiles[1] during the call for agenda items. |
| 22 |
Did I miss something while making the proposal? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I believe this was previously discussed and the general consensus was |
| 25 |
that EAPI 2 and later require discussion, but EAPI 1 is very |
| 26 |
straightforward. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Thanks, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
1. http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_0dc7c5f932d4578baaf9e621b5eb4cac.xml |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives