1 |
W dniu wto, 02.01.2018 o godzinie 14∶35 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time |
4 |
> to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda |
5 |
> to discuss or vote on. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to |
8 |
> repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously |
9 |
> suggested one (since the last meeting). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on Sunday 2018-01-07. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Please reply to the gentoo-project list. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
I'd like to ask Council what to do about arches without arch teams. |
17 |
In particular, I'm talking about the architectures whose partial support |
18 |
vapier had been committing haphazardly and that do not have |
19 |
corresponding projects or aliases, that is: |
20 |
|
21 |
nios2 |
22 |
riscv |
23 |
|
24 |
This means that developers only see the keywords randomly appearing |
25 |
in their packages but neither developers nor users have any way to |
26 |
properly contact the arch team (because it doesn't exist!). |
27 |
|
28 |
That said, I'd like to propose an official policy that no new arches can |
29 |
be added without being assigned to a specific project (arch team). |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Best regards, |
33 |
Michał Górny |