Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 07:52:01
Message-Id: e3ae781e-fc91-a295-b2d5-de8b4ee42021@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by Daniel Campbell
1 On 11/07/2016 08:43 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
2 > Gentoo is ultimately better off if it takes its stance of
3 > non-involvement more seriously and butts out of any disputes until
4 > they affect Gentoo itself, i.e. commit wars, spam or harassment in
5 > IRC/forums, etc.
6
7 This is building on the wrong premise; disputes are hurting recruiting
8 and involvement level of existing devs long before they materialize at
9 these levels, the consequence just being a worse off distribution.
10
11
12 > Removing comrel can reduce legal liability in that there _is_ no
13 > investigative team involved, no slander or libel to worry about
14
15 Inaction can be equal to worse than action in any given situation
16
17 > Large problems can be pushed to the council,
18
19 It already is, council happen to have set up a group of devs to handle
20 it when it does, this is comrel.
21
22
23 --
24 Kristian Fiskerstrand
25 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
26 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>