1 |
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Dnia 2014-07-31, o godz. 22:17:59 |
3 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> napisał(a): |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> > |
7 |
>> > Yes, exactly. We need to get dynamic-deps right if they are ever |
8 |
>> > supposed to become the default. That's one of the reasons that we want |
9 |
>> > to revert the problematic changes and make Portage use the default |
10 |
>> > model once again. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Do we actually have some kind of list of issues with dynamic deps? |
13 |
>> The only specific one that I think I've seen is with prerm and subslot |
14 |
>> deps, but as was pointed out that issue actually is as much of a |
15 |
>> problem with static deps unless you unmerge all the reverse-deps |
16 |
>> before upgrading anything, followed by a re-merge. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I already listed the major issues in my second reply to Michael. And I |
19 |
> forgot about prerm() again, thanks for adding it :). |
20 |
|
21 |
Any chance of a link? I'm honestly not finding this list in my list |
22 |
history, and a search on gmane for kensington with your from address |
23 |
only comes up with one email in the last few weeks - the one I replied |
24 |
to. |
25 |
|
26 |
Is it possible you're referring to a private email, or some list not on gmane? |
27 |
|
28 |
Rich |