| 1 |
On 2015.04.26 12:11, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
[snip] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> A simpler solution might be to restrict foundation membership to |
| 5 |
> active developers/staff, and revoke membership once somebody is no |
| 6 |
> longer an active developer/staff. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> This also solves the double-constituency problem where you end up |
| 9 |
> with |
| 10 |
> two governing bodies with different constituencies, where conflict |
| 11 |
> between them is fairly likely to be destructive to the organization. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> -- |
| 14 |
> Rich |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Rich, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Its not a practical problem - yet. |
| 22 |
The Foundation only has about five members from the user community. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
A more inclusive approach may be to open council membership to all |
| 25 |
contributors to Gentoo. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Roy Bamford |
| 31 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 32 |
elections |
| 33 |
gentoo-ops |
| 34 |
forum-mods |
| 35 |
trustees |
Archives