| 1 |
On September 21, 2019 2:48:29 PM EDT, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 14:36 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Our PMS is largely maintained |
| 4 |
>> by a former dev who many do not get along with. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>This is not true. It is maintained by a few active Gentoo devs, |
| 7 |
>and by a quick peak last non-Gentoo-dev patch was committed in 2012. |
| 8 |
>In fact, EAPI 7 has been rejected in Paludis. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> Our founder isn't |
| 11 |
>> really involved as a dev but never wanders too far and maintains a |
| 12 |
>> fairly friendly fork. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>'Friendly fork', right. I guess everyone is welcome to watch and make |
| 15 |
>his/her own opinion. However, it doesn't sound like you really have |
| 16 |
>verified any of those statements. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>That's just to correct things. Now, guys, can we please stay on topic? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>I welcome all your support but of the three replies so far, nobody has |
| 21 |
>provided any opinion on the proposal in question. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
The proposal is good, but I find it unnecessary at the same time. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Of the devs appealing their retirement at the 11th... I find most of them have spent more time debating then just making a few simple commits to be active. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Conversely, I see devs who just contribute and the undertaker's reverse the retirement process. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Contribute || retire. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Archives