Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2015-01-13: call for agenda items
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:28:59
Message-Id: 20141230082843.63a80978@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2015-01-13: call for agenda items by Dean Stephens
1 On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 00:00:04 -0500
2 Dean Stephens <desultory@g.o> wrote:
3 > On 12/29/14 15:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
4 > > I'll certainly agree that not everything needs a formal project.
5 > > However, if a project wants to have authority/autonomy beyond
6 > > anything-goes, then it should welcome members and elect a lead
7 > > regularly.
8 > >
9 > There is at least a defensible argument to be made that being able to
10 > reject applicants is more important to being able to maintain a
11 > coherent project than the often indicated duty to accept anyone who
12 > shows interest.
13
14 But Gentoo is primarily about the Community, not the quality of the
15 product. Requiring technical ability discourages contributions, and a
16 lack of bugs decreases the volume of forum posts, so they are
17 poisonous to the Community.
18
19 --
20 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies