1 |
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:07:42 -0500 |
2 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Honestly, it seems to me that this failure is almost the entire |
4 |
> > reason that we're re-writing the thing, and I don't really see how |
5 |
> > the new version is any different from the old. I think the |
6 |
> > previous failure was in execution, not in concept (and I don't |
7 |
> > blame the Proctors themselves for that). |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I agree. It's in large part because we as a council failed to back |
10 |
> them up sufficiently. As soon as they got any heat, they were on |
11 |
> their own. |
12 |
|
13 |
Yes, it's important for the success of these kinds of policies that the |
14 |
higher ups to provide unconditional and unquestioning support to their |
15 |
team. One mustn't allow their actions to be criticised or it undermines |
16 |
their ability to act without restraint. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |