1 |
Am Montag, 3. Mai 2021, 17:31:03 CEST schrieb Thomas Deutschmann: |
2 |
> On 2021-05-03 17:04, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
3 |
> > Please don't go the "we are not responsible for anything" route, |
4 |
> > that's the fastest way to obstruct any productivity. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Well, I don't know what we will discuss and what will be the |
7 |
> outcome. But imagine we would all agree and send a request to |
8 |
> foundation to stop spending AWS credits for X immediately. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Foundation has to reject this request by law because such a request |
11 |
> must come from a natural person. |
12 |
|
13 |
Seriously, if the council would send a polite and friendly request to |
14 |
the foundation, and the trustees would outright refuse it only for |
15 |
that formal reason, I would consider that hostile and unconstructive |
16 |
behavior. Law doesn't come in because the trustees themselves can |
17 |
introduce motions. |
18 |
|
19 |
We should try to work together. |
20 |
|
21 |
If some of us don't do that, we need to find a better solution for |
22 |
Gentoo. That's why (following the ugly debates around Ian) I want a |
23 |
single elected body to be responsible. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
27 |
dilfridge@g.o |
28 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
29 |
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |