1 |
On Monday, December 5, 2016 10:34:06 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 |
> On 12/05/2016 10:24 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
3 |
> > On Monday, December 5, 2016 10:17:26 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
4 |
> >> On 12/05/2016 10:12 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
5 |
> >>> SPF is in place, but something is amiss. |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> SPF doesn't have anything to do with the "From" address. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Do you know about SPF at all? That is EXACTLY its purpose... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> No, it isn't. Please just stop. |
12 |
|
13 |
You are factually wrong! If you think I am, provide a link and proof where I |
14 |
am wrong. |
15 |
|
16 |
"Originally SPF stood for Sender Permitted From...." |
17 |
|
18 |
"SPF allows the owner of an Internet domain to specify which computers are |
19 |
authorized to send mail with "from" addresses in that domain, using Domain |
20 |
Name System (DNS) records. " |
21 |
|
22 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework |
23 |
|
24 |
Why do you think it is called "SENDER" as in who the email is FROM.... |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |