Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:03:11
Message-Id: CAGfcS_nxEAdGbozmnorRe0+s5JKYYi1q5wdZMn=On_m+7CPd8w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization by Fabian Groffen
1 On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 12-11-2012 21:40:53 -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
3 >> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic related to
4 >> udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the vote for another
5 >> month so that we have time to get organized?
6 >
7 > The Council has no votes scheduled for today's meeting.
8 >
9
10 Huh?
11
12 2. Handling separate /usr support[1] (15 minutes)
13 - approve/disapprove plan (forcing everyone to take action, and
14 implement one of the two "supported" solutions)
15 - approve/disapprove removal of gen_usr_ldscript
16 - define timeframe
17 * 30 days
18 * 6 months
19 * 1 year
20
21 3. Policy on "<" versioned dependencies[2] (5 minutes)
22 - state whether said policy exists (homework for the council members)
23
24 Rich

Replies