1 |
I see many users who loved gentoo docs switching to archlinux wiki because |
2 |
of their standards. |
3 |
Why we can't follow a already good model and just adjust to our needs |
4 |
instead of creating and polishing a new? |
5 |
Start with everything in English but permit i18n work. |
6 |
|
7 |
The quality problem is a community problem. User can even rewrite a bad |
8 |
page. If many pages are poor in content our community is full of |
9 |
retards/trolls. |
10 |
|
11 |
2011/10/19 Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> |
12 |
|
13 |
> On Wednesday 19 of October 2011 14:37:57 Peter Volkov wrote: |
14 |
> > Hello. While it is not tool late, could you guys reconsider top-down |
15 |
> > localization approach decided on last meeting[1]? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > There are language specific things that will be be kept out of wiki only |
18 |
> > due to this policy. For example I don't see any reason to write article |
19 |
> > about use of Russian cryptography algorithms in Gentoo in any language |
20 |
> > but Russian. There is no need to have this article in English since |
21 |
> > nobody will read it. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> You mean he will be assassinated before he finishes reading so that Russian |
24 |
> secret is kept? ;) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Actually, I don't see the point in having Gentoo Wiki pages in other |
27 |
> languages |
28 |
> but English at all. Why? Quality of those will vary greatly. |
29 |
> I think such localized versions should be permitted only if they are |
30 |
> 'literal' |
31 |
> translation of English version and if we keep all language versions in |
32 |
> sync, |
33 |
> but we cannot really ensure this. |
34 |
> -- |
35 |
> regards |
36 |
> MM |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Currículo: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7541377569511492 |