Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:20:12
Message-Id: 1371039602.27198.24.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units by "Tomáš Chvátal"
1 El mié, 12-06-2013 a las 13:22 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal escribió:
2 > That is the problem, you ask for distro wide rule that unit files are
3 > fine as Markos says.
4 >
5 >
6 > We should not have any darn rule just to please one project, the best
7 > council should do is to say that systemd in main tree is fine (which
8 > it already had) and that maitnainers can offload the maintenance
9 > burden for the file to systemd team if they don't want to care about
10 > it.
11
12 I fully agree
13
14 Also, isn't it already being done with prefix (and some hardened like
15 pax_marking) stuff? Why systemd case needs to be different? (well,
16 probably people hating systemd so much will know)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units Rich Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>