1 |
2013-07-02 14:51 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): |
2 |
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 08:46:01 -0400 |
3 |
> "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@××××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
4 |
> > 11. Will you vote for providing master_repositories(), |
5 |
> > repository_path(), available_eclasses(), eclass_path() and |
6 |
> > license_path() functions in EAPI 6 |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I read about them at |
9 |
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/ch05s03s09.html. No |
10 |
> > problem here, they are informational and good information too. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Uhm, really? State one legitimate use of available_eclasses as an EAPI |
13 |
> function. |
14 |
|
15 |
E.g. finding list of eclasses to be processed during installation of app-portage/eclass-manpages, |
16 |
after dropping PORTDIR and ECLASSDIR. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |