1 |
Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2017, 15:47:46 CET schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.: |
2 |
> On Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:32:57 PM EST Johannes Huber wrote: |
3 |
> > And when the projects are not doing it, projects get disbanded. Meaning |
4 |
> > packages go to single maintainer only. Which means reporting goes away. |
5 |
> > Great plan! |
6 |
> |
7 |
> If projects are not doing it, and packages fall to a single maintainer. Then |
8 |
> should it even really be a project? A project/team ideally is more than |
9 |
> just one person. If it is just one person, it is not really a project or |
10 |
> team. Just someone scratching their itches. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Any developer can work on anything. It does not have to be a project. If you |
13 |
> are going to create a project, it should be taken some what seriously and |
14 |
> reporting should be a part of that. Not to mention should consist of more |
15 |
> than one. They should be seeking others to be part of the project team. If |
16 |
> not seeking others, its a solo mission. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Without such reporting from projects how does the Council or anyone have a |
19 |
> clue what is going on in Gentoo overall? Short of stopping by each project |
20 |
> and doing research into each. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> That said, NOTHING in the GLEP says projects are punished or dis-banned for |
23 |
> failing to report. Developers are required, or recommended to use repoman. |
24 |
> Does that mean someone who does not is removed as a developer? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> At the same time Council should have authority and reason to end a project |
27 |
> it if is not going anywhere, understaffed, etc. Again not having a project |
28 |
> does not mean you cannot work on that stuff. So a project and the work an |
29 |
> individual is doing is not related. If its individuals, plural, then a |
30 |
> project make sense. |
31 |
|
32 |
We are not a company. |
33 |
|
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Johannes |